INTRODUCTION
Albert Bandura is a social
psychologist. At the time of doing his Ph. D in 1952 , Bandura developed the social learning theory. Introducing
his theory Bandura writes “we do not blindly respond to environmental stimuli
rather we pick and choose from many environment options, basing our decisions on
our own sights and experiences’ . A
person learns through observation. A student observes others behavior and
learns through that observation. Early experiments on observational learning by
E. L. Thorndike and J. B. Waston on cats, dogs and monkeys conducted that
learning results not only by observation but from direct experiences.
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY
Social learning
theory is based on the belief that changes in one’s behavior are due to
observation and imitation. To imitate others is rather a natural human
tendency. It is a theory of learning and social behaviour which proposes that
new behaviours can be acquired by observing and imitating others. It states
that learning is a cognitive process that takes place in a social context and
can occur purely through observation or direct instruction. Learning also
occurs through the observation of rewards and punishments.
In social
learning theory, Bandura agrees with the behaviourists’ learning theories of classical conditioning
and operant conditioning. However, he adds two important ideas;
v
Mediating
processes occur between stimuli and responses.
v
Behaviour
is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning.
Albert Bandura agreed
with Miller and Dollard about the importance of imitation. In his book ‘Social
Learning and Personality Development’, they have stressed two points. First,
merely observing another person might be sufficient to lead a learned response.
Second observational learning may not necessarily lead to imitation. Here, the
observational learning is a complex phenomenon and not mere imitation.
BOBO DOLL EXPERIMENT
Bandura (1961) conducted a study
to investigate if social behaviours (i. e. aggression) can be acquired by
observation and imitation.
SAMPLE
Bandura and Ross and Ross (1961) tested 36
boys and 36 girls from ihe Stanford University Nursery School aged between 3 to 6 years old.
METHOD
A lab experiment was used, in which the independent variable was
manipulated in three conditions;
v
Aggressive
model shown to 24 children
v
Non
- aggressive children model shown to 24 children
v
No
model shown- 24 children
STAGE
1: MODELING
In the experimental conditions
children were individually shown into a room containing toys and played with
some potato prints and pictures in a corner for 10 minutes while either:
1.
24
children (12 girls and 12 boys) watched a male or female model behaving
aggressively towards a toy called a ‘ Bobo doll’. The adults attacked the Bobo
doll in a distinctive manner – they used hammer in some cases, and in others
threw the doll in the air and shouted.
2.
Another
24(12 girls and 12 boys) children were exposed to a non- aggressive model who played in a quiet and subdued manner for
10 minutes.
3.
The
final 24 children (12 girls and 12 boys) were used as a control group and not
exposed to any model at all.
STAGE
2: AGGRESSION AROUSAL
All the children were
subjected to ‘mild aggression arousal’. Each child was taken to a room with
attractive toys. A soon as the child started to play with the toys the
experimenter told the child that these were the experimenter’ s very best toys and she has decided to reserve
them for the other children.
STAGE
3: TEST FOR DELAYED IMITATION
·
The
next room contained some aggressive toys and some non- aggressive toys.
·
The
child was in the room for 20 minutes and their behavior was observed and rated
through a one way mirror.
·
Other
behaviors that didn’t imitate that of the model were also recorded.
RESULTS
v
Children
who observed the aggressive model made far more imitative aggressive responses than those who were in the non-
aggressive or control groups.
v
There
was more partial and non- imitative aggression among those children who has
observed aggressive behavior, although the difference for non- imitative
aggression was small.
v
The
girls in the aggressive model condition also showed more physical aggressive responses
if the model was male, but more verbal aggressive responses if the model was
female. However, the exception to this general pattern was the observation of
how often they punched Bobo, and in this case the effects of gender were
reversed.
v
Boys
were more likely to imitate same sex- models than girls. The evidence for girls
imitating same sex- model is not strong.
v
Boys
imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls. There was little
difference in the verbal aggression between boys and girls.
OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING
Observational learning
describes the process of learning through watching others, retaining the
information and then later replicating the behaviours that were observed. Observational
learning is sometimes also referred to as shaping, modeling, and vicarious
reinforcement. While it can take place at any point in life, it tends to be the
most common during childhood as children learn from the authority figures and
peers in their lives .Observational learning also plays an important role in
the socialization process, as children learn how to behave and respond to
others by observing how their parents and other caregivers interact with each
other and with other people.
MEDIATIONAL PROCESS
Social learning theory is often described
as the ‘bridge’ between traditional learning theory and cognitive approach.
Bandura believes that human beings are active information processor and think
about the relationship between the behavior and its consequences. Therefore
individuals do not automatically observe the behavior of a model and imitate
it. There is some thought prior to imitation and this consideration is called mediational
processes. This occurs between
observing behavior (stimulus) and imitating it or not (response).
There are four meditational processes proposed by Bandura:
i.
ATTENTION
:
It is very obvious that if learning is
observational, paying attention to a model’s behaviour is of utmost importance.
It is concluded through experiments that similarity between the model and the
observer, such as same age, same sex, etc, is effective in better learning.
ii.
RETENTION
However, the behavior is remembered. The
behavior may be noticed, but it is not always remembered which obviously
prevents imitation. It is important therefore that a memory of the behavior is
formed to be performed later by the observer.
iii.
REPRDUCTION
This is the ability to perform the behavior
that the model has just demonstrated. We see much behaviour on daily basis that
we would like to be able to imitate but this is not always possible.
iv.
MOTIVATION
The will to perform the behavior. The
rewards and punishment that follow a behavior will be considered by the
observer.
EDUCATIONAL
IMPLICATIONS
a) Students
often learn a great deal simply by observing other people.
b) Describing
the consequences of behaviours can effectively increase appropriate behaviours
and decrease inappropriate one.
c) Modeling
provides an alternative to shaping for teaching new behaviours.
d) Teachers
and parents must model appropriate behaviours and take care that they don’t
model inappropriate ones.
e) Teachers
should expose students to a variety of other models.
f) Students
must believe that they are capable of accomplishing school tasks.
g) Teachers
should help students set realistic expectations for their academic
accomplishments.
h) Self
regulation techniques provide effective methods for improving behavior.
CONCLUSION
People learn through
observing others behavior, attitudes and outcomes of those behaviours. Social
learning theory explains human behavior in terms of continuous reciprocal
interaction between cognitive, behavioural and environmental influences. People
learn the best in their own way, some people learn best from experience. Others
learn best from people telling them what to do and how to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment